No difference in match rate between women and men this year
The 2014 match results continue to show a strong presence of female graduates applying for and matching with urology programs. This year, 74 of 114 female participants (64%) matched with programs, compared to an even 64% of males, the AUA reported
The 2014 match results continue to show a strong presence of female graduates applying for and matching with urology programs. This year, 74 of 114 female participants (64%) matched with programs, compared to an even 64% of males, the AUA reported
Anyone remember the document that was released last year that broke down the match by school applicants came from and where they matched? Was the same thing released this year?
Is this document correct? Some of the scores seem really wacky - Like 269 at Iowa. Do I need to just reformat it after saving it somehow? Thanks for the help
http://urologytimes.modernmedicine.com/urology-times/news/aua-puts-2014-...
If anything there is reverse descrimination. Seem to me that many programs are going out of their way to court female applicants.
The 2014 match results continue to show a strong presence of female graduates applying for and matching with urology programs. This year, 74 of 114 female participants (64%) matched with programs, compared to an even 64% of males, the AUA reported
Anyone remember the document that was released last year that broke down the match by school applicants came from and where they matched? Was the same thing released this year?
Is this document correct? Some of the scores seem really wacky - Like 269 at Iowa. Do I need to just reformat it after saving it somehow? Thanks for the help
Hey, the scores are anonymous and don't correspond with the names/institutions to the left. At least that's what I gathered.
which columns of the master list are anonymous/not associated with the name/institution? is it just the step 1 and step 2 scores?