2013-2014 Urology Match Results (Master List Google Doc)

30 posts / 0 new
Last post
Anonymous (not verified)
Article that sums up the gender issue
Anonymous (not verified)
female applicants

If anything there is reverse descrimination. Seem to me that many programs are going out of their way to court female applicants. 

uroguy88
No difference in match rate between women and men this year

The 2014 match results continue to show a strong presence of female graduates applying for and matching with urology programs. This year, 74 of 114 female participants (64%) matched with programs, compared to an even 64% of males, the AUA reported

Anonymous (not verified)
Women

uroguy88 wrote:
The 2014 match results continue to show a strong presence of female graduates applying for and matching with urology programs. This year, 74 of 114 female participants (64%) matched with programs, compared to an even 64% of males, the AUA reported
 MGH has two women. 

Anonymous (not verified)
MGH

Anonymous User wrote:
MGH has two women. 
MGH has four current female residents and just matched a fifth this year...

Anonymous (not verified)
Match summary

Anyone remember the document that was released last year that broke down the match by school applicants came from and where they matched?  Was the same thing released this year?

jtayl20
Doc Broken

Is this document correct? Some of the scores seem really wacky - Like 269 at Iowa. Do I need to just reformat it after saving it somehow? Thanks for the help 

güb3rnaculum
Hey, the scores are anonymous

Hey, the scores are anonymous and don't correspond with the names/institutions to the left. At least that's what I gathered. 

AKwildcat
which columns of the master

which columns of the master list are anonymous/not associated with the name/institution? is it just the step 1 and step 2 scores?